EMPLOYMENT LAW NEWS: Unemployment decision emphasizes consistent application of work rules

By Rudman Winchell Attorney

by Anne-Marie Storey, Esq.

A recent decision from the unemployment commission demonstrates why it is important to enforce your work rules consistently. According to the reported summary of the case, an employee became involved in a heated exchange with her supervisor. During that exchange, the supervisor either slapped the employee on the arm or brushed her arm out of his way. The employee did not engage in any physical contact with the supervisor but reportedly acted in a confrontational way. Ultimately, the employee was terminated for “gross insubordination”. The supervisor was not disciplined for his behavior toward the employee. Although the Commission initially ruled the employee was terminated for misconduct and thus not entitled to unemployment benefits, the Superior Court reversed that decision. The Court determined that although it was reasonable to require an employee to follow work rules, including a rule prohibiting confrontational behavior, that behavior occurred by both individuals in this incident and therefore the rule was applied inconsistently because the supervisor was not disciplined at all. Thus, the employee was determined to have been discharged without misconduct.


These materials have been prepared by Rudman Winchell for educational purposes only. They should not be considered legal advice. The transmission of this information to you is not intended to create a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. You should not send any confidential or private information to Rudman Winchell until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established, in writing.